![numol:
freececemcdonald:
!!!LAST CALL IN DAY BEFORE TRIAL: CALL IT IN FOR CECE!!!
On April 17th, call, email, and fax Hennepin County Attorney Michael Freeman and demand he drop the charges against CeCe. This time, we are extending the call-in to include Assistant Attorney Marlene Senechal, head of adult prosecution.
!!NEW!! Please CC mpls4cece@gmail.com on all your e-mails. Also please send us an e-mail with the time of your calls & faxes.
LET’S LET FREEMAN AND SENECHAL KNOW THAT WE WONT STAND FOR THE RACIST, TRANSPHOBIC PROSECUTION OF CECE!
While Chrishaun “CeCe” McDonald is being prosecuted for murder after being violently attacked for her race and gender, Freeman’s office recently declined to prosecute the killer of Darrell Evanovich, a black man who was shot dead by a white man after an alleged robbery. While no person should be thrown to the mercy of the soulless, so-called “justice” system, the fact that CeCe is on trial after being assaulted, while a white man who killed someone after chasing them down is touted as a “good Samaritan,” highlights the racist and transphobic nature of the prosecution of CeCe. Hennepin County Attorney Michael Freeman and Marlene Senechal have the power to drop the charges against CeCe. So far, though, he has implicitly sided with CeCe’s white supremacist attackers by failing to acknowledge the racist, transphobic assault that she survived as a mitigating factor in the unintentional death of Dean Schmitz.
When: Tuesday, April 17th, ALL DAY
Where:From home, work, wherever you find yourself!
What: Call Michael Freeman at 612-348-5540, fax at 612-348-2042, and email at citizeninfo@co.hennepin.mn.us
Call Marlene Senechal at 612-348-5561, fax at 612-348-3061, and email at citizeninfo@co.hennepin.mn.us
!!NEW!! Please CC mpls4cece@gmail.com on all your e-mails. Also please send us an e-mail with the time of your calls & faxes.
Remember to remain polite but assertive. Some key points to mention in your calls, emails, and faxes are:
Identify yourself as a supporter, friend, family member, or community member calling about Ms. Chrishaun McDonald’s case.
Tell the County Attorney’s Office why you’re concerned: Ms. McDonald was the target of a hate crime, but she was singled out for aggressive prosecution after the attack.
County Attorney Freeman has declined to press charges in cases like this at least three times already this year. Remind him that he has the power to drop the charges against Ms. McDonald.
Tell Freeman and Senechal not to side with Ms. McDonald’s white supremacist attackers: drop the charges against Ms. McDonald.
Tell Hennepin County Attorney Michael Freeman and Assistant Attorney Marlene Senechal to take a stand against hate, racism, and transphobia. Tell Freeman and Senechal to DROP THE CHARGES against Chrishaun McDonald!
to anyone reading this: PLEASE do this if possible, and please pass this around!
here are some online free faxing places for if you’re gonna fax:
http://www.gotfreefax.com (up to 2 a day for free)
http://faxzero.com (allegedly up to 2 a day for free but one of those sometimes causes an error)
http://www.myfax.com/free (up to 2 a day for free)
also:
here’s a post that has the Petition to drop the charges (link);
here’s where to donate to CeCe’s support fund (link);
and here’s the “Get Involved” page for the blog (link), which has more:
There are many ways you can support CeCe! Check out the links below for information on various ways to get involved. Email us at mpls4cece(A)gmail.com if you wanna come to a support committee meeting or have questions about ways to help.
and here’s the “Court Dates and Rallies” page (link) — right now it includes: Motion hearing scheduled for April 24; the CeCe Solidarity Dance Party on April 26; and CeCe’s Trial on April 30.
[re-reblogging this a few more times today.]](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2ls78t9Nn1rsvfyoo1_500.jpg)
Komen Reverses Decision to Cut Funding to Planned Parenthood
“Every woman needs to know the facts. And the fact is, when it comes to breast cancer, every woman is at risk.” - Debbie Wasserman Schultz
The Susan G. Komen Foundation has reversed their decision to drop funding for Planned Parenthood. The SGKF says its mission is to ensure women are able to access exams for early detection of breast cancer, and this reversal is evidence that their initial break from Planned Parenthood had more to do with politics and personal agendas. Members of SGKF’s senior staff who represent religious right-wing, anti-choice ideologies tried unsuccessfully to sacrifice poor women on their bronze-age altars of ignorance.
The poor are usually the ones clinging onto the shit-end of the religious right’s stick of judgement, and had their decision to block funding been upheld, it would have ended the nearly 170,000 clinical breast exams and 6,400 mammogram referrals that Planned Parenthood is able to provide through Komen funds
A Win For Minorities…
A lion’s share of the women who use Planned Parenthood are low-income African-Americans and Latinas. According to the National Cancer Institute, the lack of early access to breast cancer screening that leads to early treatment is one of the primary reasons African-American and Latina women have a higher rate of death from breast cancer over the rest of the population.
Historically, African American and Latina women make up a huge chunk of the poor, uninsured or under-insured population, along with Native American women, as well. Planned Parenthood remains, for many of them, the only place where they can go to receive breast cancer screenings, mammograms, etc.
The Lameness… It Burns…
The excuse, and it is an excuse, that SGKF used to initially defund PP was,
“Currently, however, various authorities at both the state and federal levels are conducting investigations involving [Planned Parenthood] and some of its local chapters, and the organization is barred from receiving government funding in numerous states. Under these new criteria, Planned Parenthood will be ineligible to receive new funding from Komen until these investigations are complete and these issues are resolved.”
This initial decision blew up in their face, which is is apparent by today’s statement:
“We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women`s lives,” Komen said in a statement on Friday.
“We will continue to fund existing grants, including those of Planned Parenthood, and preserve their eligibility to apply for future grants, while maintaining the ability of our affiliates to make funding decisions that meet the needs of their communities.”
Komen said it will amend its new funding criteria to “ensure that politics has no place in our grant process.”
This came after it was discovered that there were no “authorities”investigating Planned Parenthood, nor was Planned Parenthood barred from receiving federal government funding anywhere. It was just another witch-hunt brought on by the religious right. The “investigation” in question stemmed from a Congressional inquiry at the request of House Energy and Commerce Oversight and Investigations Chairman Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.). He sent a letter to Planned Parenthood in September of last year requesting documents to determine whether or not Planned Parenthood used used federal funds to provide abortion services.
A Little Background…
Last year, SGKF brought on board a woman named Karen Handel. We know her very well here in Georgia from her bid for Governor. She is a well-known anti-choice politician, and part of her platform (endorsed by Sarah Palin) was a promise to defund Planned Parenthood. As a side note, her gubernatorial race was endorsed by Mitt Romney, who contributed funds to her campaign. Romney has also promised a federal personhood amendment as well as to defund Planned Parenthood.
To add insult to injury, SGKF added Jane Abraham to it’s Advocacy Alliance Board. Abraham is the General Chairman Susan B. Anthony List, which is also a pro-life organization. She also runs it’s PAC and is a director of an organization called “Nuturing Network,” which routinely spreads ideological propaganda via nefarious methods. Interestingly enough, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s wife, Maureen, is also on their board.
In an article written by Jeffrey Goldberg in The Atlantic, it is made clear that SGKF’s initial decision to eliminate breast-cancer screening grants to Planned Parenthood affiliates was a political decision. He writes,
“But three sources with direct knowledge of the Komen decision-making process told me that the rule was adopted in order to create an excuse to cut off Planned Parenthood. (Komen gives out grants to roughly 2,000 organizations, and the new “no investigations” rule applies to only one so far.) The decision to create a rule that would cut funding to Planned Parenthood, according to these sources, was driven by the organization’s new senior vice president for public policy, Karen Handel, a former gubernatorial candidate from Georgia who is staunchly anti-abortion and who has said that since she is “pro-life, I do not support the mission of Planned Parenthood.”
Nicholas Jackson, also of The Atlantic, offers an excellent commentary as well, including,
“…the fact is that the organization devotes most of its money and manpower to screening for breast, cervical, and testicular cancers; treating menopause; testing for sexually transmitted diseases; and more.
The money provided by Susan G. Komen for the Cure went to just a fraction — about 19 according to one report – of Planned Parenthood’s more than 85 affiliates. And it was all — roughly $680,000 last year and $580,000 the year before that — used for breast-cancer screening and other breast-health services for low-income, uninsured, and under-insured women.”
Can I Get A Witness…?
But what it all comes down to are the women. I would be remiss if I did not offer you, dear readers, some personal testimony from women who’s lives have been saved through the efforts of Planned Parenthood. You can check out the “Planned Parenthood Saved Me” website, which includes real letters from real survivors, such as,
“I was 19 years old, sexually active for the first time in my life, confused and wanting to know what options I had. I also had no insurance and a part time job. They examined me, instructed me on breast self examinations and gave me birth control pills. The entire time they treated me with nothing but compassion and dignity. A few years later I had irregular bleeding and pain, turned out to be nothing serious, but again, there was PP to help me and make sure I got the care I needed. Anybody who opposes Planned Parenthood really has no idea what kind of a wonderful organization they are. Many women would be very sick, wounded or dead if it not for Planned Parenthood. Please, don’t let politics get in the way of providing much needed health care to women. This is absurd.”
And,
“Three decades ago when I was iIn my early 20s I was a student, working full time with no insurance. Planned Parenthood was my only option for my examinations. One exam found early stages of cervical cancer. Planned Parenthood arranged for treatment for me at no cost. Without them, I doubt I’d be here today. Thank you for saving my life.”
You will find pages and pages of similar stories by regular women who are thankful for the services that Planned Parenthood provided.
Abortion Just A Small Percentage…
The website of MoveOn offers information about the scant 3% of Planned Parenthood’s patient care actually going to abortion services. They reiterate that, according to federal law, government funds cannot be used for abortion procedures, so defunding of Planned Parenthood would have only resulted in poor people who are in need of cancer screenings, contraception, and STD testing getting hurt. Here’s a handy chart for you:
As you can see, most o the services provided by Planned Parenthood have nothing to do with abortion.
Political Pushback…
The decision of the SGKF to reverse their mandate to defund Planned parenthood was aided by twenty-six United States Senators who signed a letter urging Komen to reverse its decision. Here is the contents of that letter, addressed to Susan G. Komen for the Cure Founder Ambassador Nancy Brinker:
Dear Ambassador Brinker,
We write to express our disappointment with Susan G. Komen for the Cure’s decision to cut funding for breast cancer prevention, screening, and education at Planned Parenthood health centers. This troubling decision threatens to reduce access to necessary, life-saving services. We urge Komen to reconsider its decision.
Planned Parenthood is a trusted provider of health care for women and men. More than 90 percent of the services provided by Planned Parenthood are primary and preventative including wellness exams and cancers screenings that save lives. Each year, Planned Parenthood health clinics provide 750,000 breast exams, 770,000 pap tests and nearly 4 million tests and treatments for sexually transmitted diseases. Twenty percent of all women in the U.S. have visited a Planned Parenthood health center.
For the past five years, grants to local affiliates of Planned Parenthood have been an important part of Planned Parenthood’s work to protect women from breast cancer. Komen funding for Planned Parenthood has provided nearly 170,000 clinical breast exams and resulted in 6,400 referrals for mammograms. In 2011 alone, grants from Komen provided Planned Parenthood with roughly $650,000 in funding for breast cancer prevention, screening, and education. According to a recent statement by Komen, “In some areas of the U.S., our affiliates have determined a Planned Parenthood clinic to be the best or only local place where women can receive breast health care.”
It would be tragic if any woman —let alone thousands of women — lost access to these potentially life-saving screenings because of a politically motivated attack.
We earnestly hope that you will put women’s health before partisan politics and reconsider this decision for the sake of the women who depend on both your organizations for access to the health care they need.
This letter has been signed, at the time of this writing, by,
- Frank Lautenberg (NJ)
- Patty Murray (WA)
- Barbara Mikulski (MD)
- Barbara Boxer (CA)
- Maria Cantwell (WA)
- Kirsten Gillibrand (NY)
- Robert Menendez (NJ)
- Ron Wyden (OR)
- Richard Blumenthal (CT)
- Jeanne Shaheen (NH)
- Mark Begich (AK)
- Jeff Merkley (OR)
- John Tester (MT)
- Daniel Akaka (Hawaii)
- Bernie Sanders (VT)
- Sherrod Brown (OH)
- Leahy, Max Baucus (MT)
- Ben Cardin (MD)
- Dianne Feinstein (CA)
- Al Franken (MN)
- John Kerry (MA).
If these are your representatives, I would strongly suggest that you write them a note of appreciation.
Next Stop, Stem Cell Research…
As reporded on Daily Kos, a statement released at around the same time as the Planned Parenthood defunding was being planned, the Komen Foundation will also be denying any funding for cancer research that uses embryonic stem cells [PDF].
“This was another demand from the far right, after they learned that the Komen Foundation worked with research groups that had apparently unrelated embryonic stem cell research programs, like the National Cancer Institute and Yale, and apparently one the board of the Komen Foundation were just as eager to acquiesce to.”
We still have work to do, my friends. We have won one battle, but…
Activism Works…
There are several members of my family who have been touched by breast cancer. Some of them are survivors, some have succumbed. The efforts of the religious right to relegate a huge percentage of our population was squashed by activism. The indignation that was unleashed by hundreds of thousands of individuals, including the politicians above, is what caused the SGKF to reverse their decision. It is highly unlikely that those who caused the decision to defund had a change of heart.
It was you, dear reader, who came together in one of the largest grass-roots efforts that I can remember, that are to thank. Activism works. Thank you for speaking out. Thousands of women will now get to live because of you.
![fuckyeahdrugpolicy:
Yes!
UConn SSDP successfully changes a campus marijuana policy | Dare Generation Diary
STORRS, CT – Following a meeting with student government leaders on January 30, 2011, the University of Connecticut’s Office of Community Standards altered its penalties for students found in possession of small amounts of marijuana, equalizing the punishment with underage drinking. The change is largely in response to Connecticut’s recent decriminalization of marijuana, which lowered the penalty for possession of under half an ounce of marijuana to a fine of $150 and a 60-day license suspension for those under 21, rather than up to a year in jail and a $1,000 fine. The penalty for underage alcohol possession is a fine of $181 and a 150-day license suspension.
Sam Tracy, current President of the Student Body and former president of UConn Students for Sensible Drug Policy (SSDP), says, “I am happy to have worked with the Office of Community Standards to update the list of possible sanctions, effectively equalizing the punishments for underage drinking and possession of small amounts of marijuana. This change has made UConn’s response to these two minor drug violations much more sensible, focusing on the health of the student rather than on harsh sanctions that do nothing to solve the problem.”
The Undergraduate Student Government (USG) has been working on reforming marijuana penalties for many months now, beginning with its endorsement of marijuana decriminalization in March 2011. Student Body President Sam Tracy authored the endorsement as a Senator and later won the race for President on a platform that included reforming campus marijuana policies. In November 2011, the Undergraduate Student Government passed a statement of position supporting allowing Resident Assistants to handle marijuana violations, rather than the current policy in which Resident Assistants are required to call the UConn Police Department if they suspect someone is in possession of marijuana.
Bryan Flanaghan, USG Senator and author of the bill, said, “A vast majority of incidents at UConn involving marijuana involve small, decriminalized amounts, so it makes sense for Residential Life to handle these incidents internally and save the police time that could be better used stopping drunk drivers or other dangerous activities.” Following the bill’s passage, USG leaders set up a meeting with top administrators to discuss the proposal. The administrators were reluctant to take police out of confrontations involving marijuana, citing concerns for the safety of Resident Assistants and the possibility that offenders could be in possession of large amounts of marijuana that would require an arrest.
However, it was agreed upon that rather than equalize the procedures for dealing with alcohol and marijuana violations, equalizing the sanctions would be beneficial. The Office of Community Standards’ website had previously stated that a possible sanction for underage alcohol possession was a warning and the “UConn Compass” program, which is designed to help students make healthy decisions, and that the possible sanction for “possession and/or use of illegal drugs” was a University Suspension. On Janusamary 31, the Office of Community Standards revised its policies to state that the possible sanctions for both underage alcohol possession and possession of small amounts of marijuana include a warning, UConn Compass, and a Wellness and Prevention educational sanction. The possible sanctions for both offenses, when involving aggravating factors such as prior offenses or large amounts of either drug, include “University Probation, Removal from Housing, [and a] Wellness and Prevention educational sanction.”
Michael Gallie, current president of UConn’s chapter of SSDP, says, “Equalizing UConn’s penalties for underage alcohol and small amounts of marijuana simply makes sense – when state law treats the two infractions as equal, it’s sensible for the state’s flagship university to do so as well.”
MAH STATE](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyr29iiHrN1qc1ca1o1_500.png)
